A statistical look at Man Utd’s 8-2 victory over Arsenal
Red Devils superior in all departments
A commanding performance by Manchester United saw the Red Devils beat Arsenal 8-2 at Old Trafford – a result which is destined to be remembered by both sets of supporters for quite a while yet. Using FourFourTwo’s Stats Zone application, I decided to take a look at the match from a statistical standpoint. Although an 8-2 drubbing would suggest that United were superior in all areas, it would be interesting to put some numbers to the key performance areas.
It is important to note that although Arsenal had a numerical advantage in central midfield, the performances from United’s centre backs as well as Tom Cleverley and more importantly Wayne Rooney nullified Arsenal’s ability to exploit this advantage.
Looking at the graphic which demonstrates the players’ influence on the match, we can see that United had more players who were more involved – receiving and playing more passes, whereas Arsenal were overly reliant on Rosicky and Ramsey. By the way, how is the move to Arsenal turning out for you, Aaron? It is also quite striking how much more involved United’s centre back pairing of Evans and Jones was compared to Arsenal’s Koscielny and Djourou.

I found the superlative performances of both Smalling and Jones quite pleasing as just three weeks ago, a deluded Arsenal fan voiced his opinion that they were not as good as Koscielny and Djourou. Their comical defending for Welbeck’s goal and throughout the entire match firmly planted many Arsenal fans back into the realm of reality.
As we can see from the following image, Arsenal did do their part to forge a fair few chances – not many sides come to Old Trafford and have 20 attempts on goal. Of the 20 attempts, however, only 8 were on target and, more importantly, 6 attempts were blocked by United’s defenders.

Defence:
One of the key factors of United’s victory was the superior defensive performance. Man Utd’s defenders made more interceptions (21 vs 19) and attempted more than twice as many tackles as the Gunners (31 vs 15). Crucially, United won 21 of their tackles compared to Arsenal’s 8. United also made twice as many headed clearances (6 vs 3).

Manchester United defended resolutely, outperforming their Arsenal counterparts in terms of tackling and blocks, making more than twice as many tackles and 6 blocks versus a solitary block by the Gunners.


Passing
As we can see from the graphics showing all passes played by both teams, Arsenal had a higher defensive line, which ultimately proved fatal for the gunners, but that United were also more comfortable retaining the ball in the first third of the pitch, receiving and playing the ball more often within that space.

United had 57.1% of the possession and thus completed more passes than Arsenal even attempted – 454/525 vs 325/394.

Tom Cleverley played an important part in this victory with his energetic box-to-box performance, which will be demonstrated later. He was United’s top passer completing 61 of 67 attempted passes – a 91% success ratio. Besides Ashley Young’s telling contribution to the match, it’s important to note that Chris Smalling and Jonny Evans completed more passes than the 14 other outfield players from both sides.

Jonny Evans and Phil Jones vs Djourou and Koscielny
Jonny Evans was dreadful last season, but is coming back to form and is looking more determined to win every challenge. He did concede the penalty which De Gea saved, but otherwise he had a good game making 6 clearances and 4 interceptions. Both Jones and Evans kept the ball well and moved it nicely between defence and midfield. Ronney’s and Welbeck’s pressing of the Arsenal defender’s probably also contributed to Arsenal playing the ball out of defence sooner.


Event key

The midfield battle
As stated earlier on, Tom Cleverley was very important to this victory. What we can see from the following graphic is that he completed all but 6 of his passes and that his energetic performance saw him play passes in more areas of the pitch than his counterpart, Aaron Ramsey. Cleverley and Anderson’s performance in combination with Rooney dropping deep negated Arsenal’s numerical advantage in midfield.

What we can’t see from the above graphic is Cleverley’s superb off-the-ball movement and his ability to close down opponents quickly. Cleverley passed and moved throughout the match, making himself available to receive the ball form team mates quickly after he had played the ball. He also played two great balls in the first half which sliced Arsenal’s defence wide open.
Here’s a video highlighting Cleverley’s firt half performance:
Rooney – a vital cog
Wayne Rooney had an excellent match and not just because of his hat-trick, but also because of his overall contribution to the game. Rooney pressed Arsenal’s defenders well and his movement often dragged them out of position allowing Welbeck to run into space the defenders had just vacated. Rooney also dropped deep to help out Anderson as well as Cleverley and distributed the ball intelligently, creating chances for his team mates. It might not be completely fair to compare Rooney to van Persie as the latter operated as a lone striker, but I still find Rooney’s superior contribution to the match quite striking.

Wing Play
And finally, let’s talk about United’s wingers. Nani had a poor match against Spurs, but had an improved showing versus Arsenal. Had it not been for his selfishness, he might well have been able to create a goal or two for his team mates. Nonetheless, he kept Traore busy, was a constant wide outlet for United and scored United’s 5th goal. Nani also performed his defensive duties and actually won three tackles which is quite pleasing.
Ashley young had an impressive game for United. He was a constant threat on the left, scored two absolute beauties and was able to switch play to the right side with some nice cross-field passes. Both Nani and Young stayed wide for most of the match, while Arsenal’s wingers tended to drift more in comparison. Both Arshavin’s and Walcott’s contributions were more ‘dispersed’ and both were less involved in the game than their United counterparts. I guess it helps if your team mates know where to find you.


Room for improvement?
It would seem that United attempted only one solitary cross from the left flank and maybe that is an area which United could exploit more effectively.

Conclusion
Manchester United were superior in all areas from front to back. Phil Jones and Jonny Evans were comfortable moving the ball within the first third of the pitch and then out to midfield. Cleverley’s energetic performance was impressive and in tandem with Rooney, they were able to drag Arsenal’s players out of position with their movement as well as quick, interchanging passes, which created space and chances for team mates. United’s wingers were superior and contributed more than Arsenal’s. Needless to say, United showed more heart, passion, worked harder and were more clinical infront of goal.
A slight concern would be the defending for the first goal conceded and Jonny Evans absolutely MUST stop using his arms so much. An additional are of improvement could possibly be to increase the amount of crosses from the left side of the pitch.




August 30th, 2011 at 4:40 pm
Whilst a decent article, I think youve missed the most vital factor.
If roles were reversed and Utd came to the Emirates with a below strength team, and found themselves second best and behind at half time…… Would Utd have collapsed?
The lack of winning mentality was quite shocking. Mentally Utd beat us far more than any physical aspect of the game on the pitch.
August 30th, 2011 at 5:36 pm
I said at the start of last week that the Udinese game was not the one to worry about as our suspended players were available. I knew it could have ended up a cricket score at O.T and quite frankly I think Utd have done Arsenal fans a big favour. If it had only been 2-1 or 3-1 it would have papered over the cracks and we would have heard the same old rubbish about the strength of our team while all fans and pundits know it is not good enough. This result means there is nowhere to hide with our deficiencies and will likely have a more positive effect on the board and Wenger than a narrow win would have. I don’t think goal difference will have a massive effect on us come the end of the season so it is still 3 points dropped whichever way you look at it. If the win was narrower I could see Wenger using missing players as the excuse and then continue to stumble along thinking the team is good enough. This was a wake up and smell the roses moment and could ironically be the thing that will see us return to the top and challenge you sooner.
August 30th, 2011 at 6:01 pm
We were shocking, without Wilshere, Frimpong, Song, Vermaelen, Sagna, Gervinho, Gibbs. Had Cesc and Nasri leave…in other words a pathetic midfield and defence.
But that highlights how Arsenal lack depth in the squad.
Man Utd on the other hand have plenty of depth, and the hunger and team spirit to fight for a full 90 mins, so you cannot take anything away from them.
A fair article, and enjoy the scoreline, but this kind of defeat is against an Arsenal team the weakest of which I have seen under Wenger’s reign.
Far too many points show it’s time for new blood in the team, and more importantly in terms of management. Time for Wenger to go once and for all…bring in Rijkaard or Hiddink!
August 30th, 2011 at 6:32 pm
i luv AFC,d defeat @ OT was a wake up call i don’t know if other fans would have prefered a 3-0 loss to a 2nd-tier side like eveton,stoke,sunderland or fulham.Taking Wenger out of there now too would not help,the truth has always being there and i just hope that now that it has been fully blown in our faces we take(AFC)take it seriously.
September 2nd, 2011 at 4:49 am
The 8-2 papered over the cracks. Utd’s central midfield is nowhere near good enough. We saw that at West Brom.